Environment Protection Authority v Panther Resources Pty Ltd and Another [2003] NSWLEC 216
Because the alleged contempt proceedings were quasi-criminal and could have serious consequences for the unrepresented second respondent, including a possible custodial sentence, the appropriate course was to direct him to pursue legal aid, provide necessary supporting information, report the outcome to the applicant, and stand the matter over for mention and directions while preserving liberty to restore.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Orders in Respect of Alleged Contempt of Court / Ex Tempore Directions; Matter Stood Over for Mention and Directions
- Outcome
- Directions made and matter stood over for mention and directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['litigant in Person Facing Possible Custodial Sentence' 'pro Bono Assistance From Counsel' 'legal Aid Application' 'quasi Criminal Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Orders in Respect of Alleged Contempt of Court / Ex Tempore Directions; Matter Stood Over for Mention and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the unrepresented second respondent, facing alleged contempt proceedings with the prospect of a custodial sentence, should be required to continue to defend himself without legal representation or whether a stay may need to be considered.' 'Whether the second respondent should be directed to make a further application for legal aid and provide information in support of that application.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the alleged contempt proceedings were quasi-criminal and could have serious consequences for the unrepresented second respondent, including a possible custodial sentence, the appropriate course was to direct him to pursue legal aid, provide necessary supporting information, report the outcome to the applicant, and stand the matter over for mention and directions while preserving liberty to restore.
Court Disposition
Directions made and matter stood over for mention and directions.
Orders
- ['The second respondent, Andrew Thaler, is directed to make an application for legal aid to the Legal Aid Commission within seven days.' 'The second respondent, Andrew Thaler, is directed to provide such information as may reasonably be required by the Legal Aid Commission in support of his application and to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment