Environment Protection Authority v Fair [2024] NSWLEC 124
Mr Fair breached s 48(2) of the POEO Act between 2 June 2023 and 1 July 2023 by being the occupier of Shed B024 at 139 Wytarra Drive, North Albury, where more than 500 waste tyres were stored without a required licence. The evidence did not establish breaches at other facilities or under s 142A. The Court could declare this past breach but could not make compensatory or further injunctive orders, and costs followed the overall lack of substantive success by the EPA.
- Parties
- Applicant: Environment Protection Authority; First Respondent: Mark Garry Fair; Second Respondent: State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Enforcement Proceedings (class 4) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration of past breach and dismissal of remaining relief; applicant to pay first respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Waste Storage, Licensing Requirements, Pollution of Land, Civil Enforcement, Remedies and Declarations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Environment Protection Authority
Applicant
Mark Garry Fair
First Respondent
State of New South Wales
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement Proceedings (class 4) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Fair breached s 48(2) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) by storing more than 500 waste tyres without a licence
- 2 Whether storage of waste tyres in enclosed storage units constitutes pollution of land under s 142A of the POEO Act
- 3 Whether the Court has power to order compensation for costs incurred in tyre removal as a remedy for a civil breach of the POEO Act
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Fair breached s 48(2) of the POEO Act between 2 June 2023 and 1 July 2023 by being the occupier of Shed B024 at 139 Wytarra Drive, North Albury, where more than 500 waste tyres were stored without a required licence. The evidence did not establish breaches at other facilities or under s 142A. The Court could declare this past breach but could not make compensatory or further injunctive orders, and costs followed the overall lack of substantive success by the EPA.
Court Disposition
Declaration of past breach and dismissal of remaining relief; applicant to pay first respondent's costs.
Orders
- Declare that Mr Mark Fair breached s 48(2) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) by being the occupier between 2 June 2023 and 1 July 2023 of a storage unit at 139 Wytarra Drive, North Albury, in which more than 500 waste tyres were stored, without being the holder of a licence under the Act...
- Discharge, from the date of these orders, all orders made by consent on 20 December 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment