Environment Protection Authority v Leaway Pty Limited [2006] NSWLEC 44

Environment Protection Authority v Leaway Pty Limited [2006] NSWLEC 44

The respondent was the occupier of a licensed waste facility within the extended regulated area, was not exempt, and had not operated solely for recycling/reprocessing. The respondent was liable to pay the prescribed contributions and interest, and had breached statutory obligations and licence conditions by not...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Environment Protection Authority; Respondent: Leaway Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Enforcement / Final Judgment on Liability and Orders
Outcome
Judgment for the applicant with declarations, monetary and compliance orders against the respondent, and costs awarded to the applicant.
Legal Topics
Waste Management, Licensing Obligations, Statutory Contributions, Environmental Regulation, Civil Enforcement
Environmental Law Waste Management Licensing Obligations Statutory Contributions Environmental Regulation Civil Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Environment Protection Authority

Applicant

Leaway Pty Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Enforcement / Final Judgment on Liability and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is liable to pay contributions and interest under s 88 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 for waste received and disposed of at the facility
  2. 2 Whether the respondent breached statutory and licensing obligations to provide information and records to the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent was the occupier of a licensed waste facility within the extended regulated area, was not exempt, and had not operated solely for recycling/reprocessing. The respondent was liable to pay the prescribed contributions and interest, and had breached statutory obligations and licence conditions by not paying and failing to provide required information and records. Orders should be made accordingly.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the applicant with declarations, monetary and compliance orders against the respondent, and costs awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • Declaration of liability to pay contributions from 1 October 2002 under s 88 of the Act and Regulation for waste received and disposed at the facility.
  • Order to pay $47,418.53 in contributions for the last quarter of 2002 and first quarter 2003.