Terrano v Hunters Hill Council [2024] NSWLEC 1269
Because the parties agreed to grant consent to the amended development application subject to conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the Court could make that decision in the proper exercise of its functions after considering the applicable statutory and planning controls, the Court was required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreed decision. The appeal was therefore upheld and consent granted subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to Subs 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Actual Refusal of Development Application No. DA20230039 / Section 34 Conciliation Conference Following Mediation, With Agreement Between the Parties and Final Orders Made
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application No. DA20230039, as amended, granted consent subject to conditions at Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Appeal' 'demolition and Construction of Dwelling' 'section 34 Conciliation Agreement' 'heritage Conservation Area' 'basix Affected Development' 'stormwater Management' 'vegetation Removal and Tree Transplanting' 'landscaped Area Compliance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to Subs 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against the Actual Refusal of Development Application No. DA20230039 / Section 34 Conciliation Conference Following Mediation, With Agreement Between the Parties and Final Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 giving effect to the parties' agreement to grant consent to the amended development application." 'Whether Development Application No. DA20230039, as amended, satisfied applicable statutory and planning controls sufficiently for consent to be granted subject to conditions.' 'Whether matters including owner consent, public submissions, BASIX, contamination, vegetation removal, Sydney Harbour Catchment impacts, zoning, demolition, building height, heritage conservation, acid sulfate soils, earthworks, stormwater, landscaped area and the Hunters Hill Development Control Plan 2013 precluded the grant of consent.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties agreed to grant consent to the amended development application subject to conditions, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the Court could make that decision in the proper exercise of its functions after considering the applicable statutory and planning controls, the Court was required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreed decision. The appeal was therefore upheld and consent granted subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application No. DA20230039, as amended, granted consent subject to conditions at Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "Development Application No. DA20230039, as amended, for demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a new dwelling, front fence, swimming pool and landscaping at 4 Paul Street, Hunters Hill, is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions at Annexure 'A'."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment