EQ -v- Commission for Children & Young People [2003] NSWADT 123
The Tribunal was not comfortably satisfied, on the Briginshaw standard, that the applicant does not pose a real and material risk to children, given the seriousness of the index offence, lack of insight or rehabilitation, and expert evidence. Thus, the application for a declaration was dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaration Under Statute / Final Determination
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['prohibited Employment' 'risk Assessment' 'criminal Record Relevance' 'conditions on Declarations']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaration Under Statute / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a real and material risk to children for the purpose of s 9(4) of the Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998.' 'Whether an order allowing the applicant to work in child-related employment can be made, with or without conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was not comfortably satisfied, on the Briginshaw standard, that the applicant does not pose a real and material risk to children, given the seriousness of the index offence, lack of insight or rehabilitation, and expert evidence. Thus, the application for a declaration was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- ['Application is dismissed' "Applicant may make further application for an order under s 9(1) of the Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 at any time following the date of this decision but only in respect of voluntary employment at C's school" 'A copy of these orders to be served on the Commissioner of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment