Equititrust Limited v RM Walsh Land Holdings Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 427
Equititrust’s right of indemnity against EIF’s assets is available and sufficient to satisfy a potential costs order; no current evidence justifies suspending that right as there is no established breach of trust. Consequently, security for costs is refused.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Equititrust Limited ACN 061 383 944; First Defendant: RM Walsh Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 095 225 502 (Receiver and Manager Appointed); Second Defendant: J Delahunty Land Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 116 764 502 (Receivers and Managers Appointed); Third Defendant: Byron Bay Land Development Pty Ltd ACN 106 666 648 (Receiver and Manager Appointed); Fourth Defendant: Richard Martin Walsh; Fifth Defendant: Western Land Corporation Pty Ltd ACN 126 173 206 (Receivers and Managers Appointed); Sixth Defendant: Perivale Capital Pty Ltd ACN 124 259 150 (Receivers and Managers Appointed)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application (security for Costs)
- Outcome
- Defendants' application for security for costs dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Corporate Insolvency, Trustee Indemnity, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Equititrust Limited ACN 061 383 944
Plaintiff
RM Walsh Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 095 225 502 (Receiver and Manager Appointed)
First Defendant
J Delahunty Land Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 116 764 502 (Receivers and Managers Appointed)
Second Defendant
Byron Bay Land Development Pty Ltd ACN 106 666 648 (Receiver and Manager Appointed)
Third Defendant
Richard Martin Walsh
Fourth Defendant
Western Land Corporation Pty Ltd ACN 126 173 206 (Receivers and Managers Appointed)
Fifth Defendant
Perivale Capital Pty Ltd ACN 124 259 150 (Receivers and Managers Appointed)
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application (security for Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff trustee company must provide security for costs under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.21 or Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335, where right of indemnity against trust assets is claimed.
- 2 Whether anticipated right of indemnity from trust assets sufficiently secures possible costs orders for the defendants.
Ratio Decidendi
Equititrust’s right of indemnity against EIF’s assets is available and sufficient to satisfy a potential costs order; no current evidence justifies suspending that right as there is no established breach of trust. Consequently, security for costs is refused.
Court Disposition
Defendants' application for security for costs dismissed.
Orders
- The defendants' notice of motion filed 15 December 2011 is dismissed.
- The first to fourth defendants are to pay the plaintiff costs as agreed or assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment