Summer Hill Business Estate Pty Ltd v Equititrust Ltd [2011] NSWCA 192
Registrar is to call upon the guarantee pursuant to earlier orders. The stay originally granted is to be varied so as not to prevent action required by the Registrar to enforce the guarantee, and interlocutory steps are stood over to allow further material to be filed.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Summer Hill Business Estate Pty Ltd; Second Appellant: West Apartments Pty Ltd; Third Appellant: Demian Constructions Pty Ltd; Fourth Appellant: Shimden Pty Ltd; Fifth Appellant: CTP Pty Ltd; Sixth Appellant: Tremdell Pty Ltd; Seventh Appellant: C A R Holdings Pty Ltd; Eighth Appellant: Demian Holdings Pty Ltd; Ninth Appellant: Riverland Estate Pty Ltd; Tenth Appellant: Demian Investments Pty Ltd; Eleventh Appellant: Belgrave Holdings Pty Ltd; Respondent: Equititrust Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application in Appellate Proceedings
- Outcome
- Registrar directed to call upon guarantee, stay varied to that extent; certain orders stood over; timetable for filing evidence set; costs of today ordered to be costs in the motion.
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Orders, Stay of Proceedings, Guarantee, Security for Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Summer Hill Business Estate Pty Ltd
First Appellant
West Apartments Pty Ltd
Second Appellant
Demian Constructions Pty Ltd
Third Appellant
Shimden Pty Ltd
Fourth Appellant
CTP Pty Ltd
Fifth Appellant
Tremdell Pty Ltd
Sixth Appellant
C A R Holdings Pty Ltd
Seventh Appellant
Demian Holdings Pty Ltd
Eighth Appellant
Riverland Estate Pty Ltd
Ninth Appellant
Demian Investments Pty Ltd
Tenth Appellant
Belgrave Holdings Pty Ltd
Eleventh Appellant
Equititrust Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application in Appellate Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Registrar should be directed to call upon the guarantee provided as condition of stay
- 2 Whether stay order should be varied to permit the Registrar to act
- 3 Adjournment of other orders pending further evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Registrar is to call upon the guarantee pursuant to earlier orders. The stay originally granted is to be varied so as not to prevent action required by the Registrar to enforce the guarantee, and interlocutory steps are stood over to allow further material to be filed.
Court Disposition
Registrar directed to call upon guarantee, stay varied to that extent; certain orders stood over; timetable for filing evidence set; costs of today ordered to be costs in the motion.
Orders
- Direct the Registrar to call upon the guarantee provided to him pursuant to the orders of Allsop P of 8 February 2011 and to the extent necessary vary the stay granted by Allsop P on 8 February 2011 to permit that step to be taken.
- Stand over orders 1 and 3 of the notice of motion filed 27 June 2011 until Monday 18 July 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment