R v Cacu [2010] NSWDC 231
The combination of the suspicious conduct of the appellant, Robertson and a third man at the rear of the vehicle, the appellant's and Robertson's presentation when dealing with police, the presence of multiple mobile telephones including three without retained messages, the appellant carrying $15,000 cash in his jacket pocket, and the bank account transactions satisfied the court beyond reasonable doubt that the money may reasonably be suspected of being stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained. The appellant did not establish on the balance of probabilities that he had no reasonable grounds for suspecting that the money was stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained, because the court did...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Conviction Appeal / Appeal From Local Court Conviction to the District Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['goods in Custody' 'money Reasonably Suspected of Being Stolen or Otherwise Unlawfully Obtained' 'conviction Appeal' 'burden of Proof' 'fresh Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Conviction Appeal / Appeal From Local Court Conviction to the District Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the $15,000 in the appellant's custody may reasonably be suspected of being stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained beyond reasonable doubt." 'Whether the appellant established on the balance of probabilities that he had no reasonable grounds for suspecting that the money was stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained.' 'Whether evidence given by the appellant and tendered on his behalf could be considered when determining whether the money may reasonably be suspected of being stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained.']
Ratio Decidendi
The combination of the suspicious conduct of the appellant, Robertson and a third man at the rear of the vehicle, the appellant's and Robertson's presentation when dealing with police, the presence of multiple mobile telephones including three without retained messages, the appellant carrying $15,000 cash in his jacket pocket, and the bank account transactions satisfied the court beyond reasonable doubt that the money may reasonably be suspected of being stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained. The appellant did not establish on the balance of probabilities that he had no reasonable grounds for suspecting that the money was stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained, because the court did...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal from conviction dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment