Fuller v Albert [2021] NSWCA 88
The primary judge erred in finding no binding obligation along the lines of the pleaded terms requiring co-operation to procure subdivision and transfer: the agreement was properly read as a mutual promise by Mr Fuller and Mr Albert that, when required by the other, each would co-operate in causing Matcove to take reasonably open steps to excise and transfer the parcels. Mr Fuller's conduct in the 2016 meeting and original pleading did not amount to a repudiation accepted by Mr Albert, and the alternative defences of variation, completion, waiver, release, abandonment, estoppel, limitation and laches were not established. The loan and share transfer arrangement was a mortgage security;...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Equity Division, Corporations List of the Supreme Court of New South Wales / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; primary orders set aside; proceedings remitted to the Equity Division; notice of motion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['implied Terms in Fact' 'construction of Agreement Partly Oral, Partly Written and Partly Implied' 'repudiation and Acceptance of Repudiation' 'specific Performance and Damages' 'equity of Redemption Over Company Share' 'limitation and Laches']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Equity Division, Corporations List of the Supreme Court of New South Wales / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in construing the alleged agreement concerning subdivision and transfer of parcels of land from Matcove.' 'Whether the alleged agreement was repudiated, varied, completed, waived, released, abandoned, barred by estoppel, limitation or laches, or otherwise unenforceable.' "Whether the mortgaged share transferred to Mrs Albert remained subject to Mr Fuller's equity of redemption."]
Ratio Decidendi
The primary judge erred in finding no binding obligation along the lines of the pleaded terms requiring co-operation to procure subdivision and transfer: the agreement was properly read as a mutual promise by Mr Fuller and Mr Albert that, when required by the other, each would co-operate in causing Matcove to take reasonably open steps to excise and transfer the parcels. Mr Fuller's conduct in the 2016 meeting and original pleading did not amount to a repudiation accepted by Mr Albert, and the alternative defences of variation, completion, waiver, release, abandonment, estoppel, limitation and laches were not established. The loan and share transfer arrangement was a mortgage security;...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; primary orders set aside; proceedings remitted to the Equity Division; notice of motion dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal be allowed.' 'The orders made by the primary judge on 14 July 2020 be set aside.' 'The proceedings be remitted to the Equity Division for further determination in accordance with these reasons.' "The First and Second Respondents pay the Appellant's costs of the appeal." 'The notice of motion filed on 11...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment