Fisher v Nassar & Anor [2008] NSWLEC 1459
The application was refused because the Court was not satisfied that any part of s 10(2) was adequately met: no injury had occurred or was likely, there was no substantiated evidence directly linking the crack in the wall, driveway mounding, or sticking gates and kitchen door to the tree, and even if roots were present the impacts were very minor and other contributing factors existed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application Pursuant to S 7 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 for Removal of a Tree / Final Determination After on Site Hearing
- Outcome
- Application refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['removal of Tree' 'damage to Property' 'injury to Persons' 'tree Roots' 'section 10(2) Threshold']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Pursuant to S 7 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 for Removal of a Tree / Final Determination After on Site Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the tree has caused, is causing, or is likely in the near future to cause damage to the applicant's property or injury to persons." 'Whether the Court should order removal of the tree under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was refused because the Court was not satisfied that any part of s 10(2) was adequately met: no injury had occurred or was likely, there was no substantiated evidence directly linking the crack in the wall, driveway mounding, or sticking gates and kitchen door to the tree, and even if roots were present the impacts were very minor and other contributing factors existed.
Court Disposition
Application refused.
Orders
- ['The application is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment