Glowatzky, Eric Josef v Insultech Group Pty Ltd & Anor [1997] FCA 1035

Glowatzky, Eric Josef v Insultech Group Pty Ltd & Anor [1997] FCA 1035

There was insufficient evidence to establish reasonable cause to believe that the applicant may have a right to relief in the Court from either respondent, as uncertainty affected multiple elements of the alleged cause of action and the evidence did not support a breach of retainer or misleading conduct. Thus, the prerequisites for making an order for discovery under Order 15A r 6 were not satisfied.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 October 1997
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure – Application for Discovery From a Prospective Respondent / Judgment on Application for Discovery Prior to Commencement of Substantive Proceedings
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['discovery From Prospective Respondent' 'reasonable Cause for Relief' 'breach of Retainer' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct']
['practice and Procedure' 'trade Practices'] ['discovery From Prospective Respondent' 'reasonable Cause for Relief' 'breach of Retainer' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Practice and Procedure – Application for Discovery From a Prospective Respondent / Judgment on Application for Discovery Prior to Commencement of Substantive Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there is reasonable cause to believe the applicant may have a right to obtain relief' 'Whether an order for discovery should be made under Order 15A r 6 of the Federal Court Rules' 'Whether there was a breach of retainer by the second respondent' 'Whether misleading and deceptive conduct occurred']

Ratio Decidendi

There was insufficient evidence to establish reasonable cause to believe that the applicant may have a right to relief in the Court from either respondent, as uncertainty affected multiple elements of the alleged cause of action and the evidence did not support a breach of retainer or misleading conduct. Thus, the prerequisites for making an order for discovery under Order 15A r 6 were not satisfied.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.']