Spain v Commonwealth of Australia [2011] FCA 658
The application for an extension of time was refused because Mr Spain's claim against the Commonwealth had no prospects of success; the facts showed no acquisition of property by the Commonwealth under the Banking Act 1959 (Cth), and Mr Spain lacked standing. There was no arguable error in the primary judgment, and no sufficient grounds to grant leave to appeal or an extension of time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Extension of Time to File Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for an extension of time refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Judgment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion for Extension of Time to File Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether grounds exist to grant an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal from an interlocutory judgment' 'Whether the application has sufficient prospects of success to justify grant of leave']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for an extension of time was refused because Mr Spain's claim against the Commonwealth had no prospects of success; the facts showed no acquisition of property by the Commonwealth under the Banking Act 1959 (Cth), and Mr Spain lacked standing. There was no arguable error in the primary judgment, and no sufficient grounds to grant leave to appeal or an extension of time.
Court Disposition
Application for an extension of time refused with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time to file and serve an application for leave to appeal is refused.' 'The applicant is to pay the costs of the respondent, to be taxed or agreed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment