Foster v Sutherland Shire Council [2001] NSWLEC 89
The order issued by Sutherland Shire Council under s 121B failed to specify with adequate certainty the prohibited use and did not clearly inform the applicant of his breach or the remedy, rendering the order invalid.
- Parties
- Applicant: Eric William Foster; Respondent: Sutherland Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Determination of Referred Question of Law
- Outcome
- Order declared invalid; matter listed for further directions.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Enforcement, Validity of Orders, Certainty in Orders, Local Environmental Plans
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric William Foster
Applicant
Sutherland Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Determination of Referred Question of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order issued pursuant to s 121B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is a valid enforcement notice
- 2 Whether the order's terms are sufficiently certain
- 3 Whether the order provides adequate reasons as required by s 121L of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
The order issued by Sutherland Shire Council under s 121B failed to specify with adequate certainty the prohibited use and did not clearly inform the applicant of his breach or the remedy, rendering the order invalid.
Court Disposition
Order declared invalid; matter listed for further directions.
Orders
- The order dated 4 January 2001 issued by the respondent is not a valid order.
- Proceedings to be listed before the registrar for directions on 14 June 2001.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment