ERN17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1672
The appeal was dismissed because the asserted jurisdictional error was not made out: s 473DD was not confined to new information provided by the referred applicant; the availability of the updated 2017 DFAT country information made it open to the Authority to find exceptional circumstances justifying consideration of that information; s 473DE did not require particulars or an invitation to comment because the information was class-based and not specifically about the appellant; and no jurisdictional error was discerned concerning s 473DC.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['fast Track Reviewable Decision' 'immigration Assessment Authority' 'new Information' 'exceptional Circumstances' 'updated Country Information' 'opportunity to Comment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority fell into jurisdictional error in its application of s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by considering an updated 2017 DFAT country information report as new information in exceptional circumstances.' 'Whether s 473DD applies only to new information provided by a referred applicant.' 'Whether the Authority was required by s 473DE of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to give the appellant particulars of the 2017 DFAT report and invite comment.' 'Whether any jurisdictional error arose from the Authority not exercising powers under s 473DC of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the asserted jurisdictional error was not made out: s 473DD was not confined to new information provided by the referred applicant; the availability of the updated 2017 DFAT country information made it open to the Authority to find exceptional circumstances justifying consideration of that information; s 473DE did not require particulars or an invitation to comment because the information was class-based and not specifically about the appellant; and no jurisdictional error was discerned concerning s 473DC.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment