Wilson v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1999] FCA 1483
The notice of motion was dismissed as an abuse of process because it sought to relitigate issues already determined by a Full Court, and the Court must prevent repeated litigation of finally resolved matters.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Notice of Motion to Reopen Trial After Final Judgment and Unsuccessful Appeal
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['abuse of Process' 'setting Aside Judgment' 'fresh Evidence Post Appeal' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application / Notice of Motion to Reopen Trial After Final Judgment and Unsuccessful Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicants should be allowed to set aside a judgment of Sweeney J given in December 1992 after the dismissal of an appeal in 1994' 'Whether a notice of motion seeking to reopen decided matters constitutes an abuse of process']
Ratio Decidendi
The notice of motion was dismissed as an abuse of process because it sought to relitigate issues already determined by a Full Court, and the Court must prevent repeated litigation of finally resolved matters.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The notice of motion be dismissed, with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment