Wilson v Commonwealth of Australia [1999] FCA 1754

Wilson v Commonwealth of Australia [1999] FCA 1754

Although Einfeld J had no independent recollection of the 1994 matter, the earlier Full Court judgment in which he joined contained adverse comments about Mr Wilson's evidence, and Mr Wilson's credibility was again raised in the current appeal. A reasonably objective bystander armed with the current judgment under appeal and the 1994 Full Court judgment might apprehend that Einfeld J could not bring a wholly dispassionate and unbiased mind to the appeal, so he disqualified himself.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 August 1999
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Disqualification in an Appeal / Before Hearing of the Appeal
Outcome
Application granted; Einfeld J disqualified himself from sitting on the appeal.
Legal Topics
['judicial Disqualification' 'apprehended Bias' 'prior Involvement in Related Proceedings' 'credibility Findings']
['civil Procedure'] ['judicial Disqualification' 'apprehended Bias' 'prior Involvement in Related Proceedings' 'credibility Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Judicial Disqualification in an Appeal / Before Hearing of the Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Einfeld J should disqualify himself from sitting on the appeal because he had participated in a 1994 Full Court proceeding involving the same applicants and some of the same factual substratum.' 'Whether a reasonably objective bystander might apprehend that Einfeld J could not bring a wholly dispassionate and unbiased mind to the current appeal.']

Ratio Decidendi

Although Einfeld J had no independent recollection of the 1994 matter, the earlier Full Court judgment in which he joined contained adverse comments about Mr Wilson's evidence, and Mr Wilson's credibility was again raised in the current appeal. A reasonably objective bystander armed with the current judgment under appeal and the 1994 Full Court judgment might apprehend that Einfeld J could not bring a wholly dispassionate and unbiased mind to the appeal, so he disqualified himself.

Court Disposition

Application granted; Einfeld J disqualified himself from sitting on the appeal.

Orders

  • ['The appeal will proceed as planned before a slightly different bench.']