Luke v Mayoh [1921] HCA 39
A Judge considering leave to issue a writ for service out of jurisdiction should, in light of sec. 4 of the Service and Execution of Process Act 1901-1918, not limit the issue of writs only to cases where service was permissible under South Australian law. The Federal Act authorizes such service for all writs out of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ernest Henry Luke; Respondent: Joseph Mayoh
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 1921
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia to the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Orders below discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Service Out of Jurisdiction, Breach of Contract, Jurisdiction, Interpretation of Statutes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ernest Henry Luke
Appellant
Joseph Mayoh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From the Supreme Court of South Australia to the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to issue a writ for service out of jurisdiction should be restricted to cases where the alleged breach occurred within the jurisdiction under South Australian law or extended as permitted by the Service and Execution of Process Act 1901-1918
- 2 Whether the Supreme Court's authority to permit service out of jurisdiction is overridden or supplemented by the federal statute
Ratio Decidendi
A Judge considering leave to issue a writ for service out of jurisdiction should, in light of sec. 4 of the Service and Execution of Process Act 1901-1918, not limit the issue of writs only to cases where service was permissible under South Australian law. The Federal Act authorizes such service for all writs out of State Courts of Record without the need to inquire if the cause of action meets the state law limitations.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Orders below discharged.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Order of Supreme Court of 4th July 1921 discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment