R v Wilkinson [2004] NSWCCA 468
The sentencing judge erred by applying the standard non-parole period regime to the applicant's offence, which did not apply to offences committed before 1 February 2003, warranting appellate intervention and re-sentencing, further requiring due weight to be given to the plea of guilty, co-operation, and personal circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Re Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentence quashed; re-sentenced
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'aggravated Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'sentencing Procedure' 'form 1 Offences' 'plea of Guilty' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Re Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erroneously had regard to the standard non-parole period not applicable to the case' 'Whether the proper approach was taken to the Form 1 matters' 'Whether adequate weight was given to the plea of guilty, co-operation, poor health, and need for protection' "Whether the severity of sentence reflected error in assessing the applicant's prior criminal history"]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by applying the standard non-parole period regime to the applicant's offence, which did not apply to offences committed before 1 February 2003, warranting appellate intervention and re-sentencing, further requiring due weight to be given to the plea of guilty, co-operation, and personal circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentence quashed; re-sentenced
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal allowed' 'Sentence quashed' "Applicant sentenced to twelve years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of nine years, to be served from 9 October 2002"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment