Hodder, E.R. v. The Australian Workers Union [1985] FCA 445
The new rule 36A, if certified by the Registrar, would dispose of the applicant's objection regarding disproportionate voting strength and would not conflict with s.140(1)(c) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Erpod Paymond Hodder; Respondent: The Australian Workers' Union
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Post Judgment (consideration of Amended Rules and Adjournment)
- Outcome
- Proceedings adjourned to a date to be fixed, pending certification by the Registrar.
- Legal Topics
- Union Rules Conformity, Voting Strength of Branch Representatives, Oppressiveness of Union Rules
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erpod Paymond Hodder
Applicant
The Australian Workers' Union
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Post Judgment (consideration of Amended Rules and Adjournment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the new rule 36A of the Australian Workers' Union is in conformity with s.140(1)(c) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
- 2 Whether the old rule was oppressive due to disproportionate voting strength among branch representatives
Ratio Decidendi
The new rule 36A, if certified by the Registrar, would dispose of the applicant's objection regarding disproportionate voting strength and would not conflict with s.140(1)(c) of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904.
Court Disposition
Proceedings adjourned to a date to be fixed, pending certification by the Registrar.
Orders
- Proceedings are adjourned to a date to be fixed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment