Paul v Satici [2022] NSWSC 922

Paul v Satici [2022] NSWSC 922

For this estate and the plaintiff's circumstances (adult child, no property, dependents, medical limitations), the quarter share was inadequate provision. However, the estate was not of a size or nature to justify provision to buy an unencumbered home. Proper provision is $700,000 in place of her quarter share, including a buffer for rent and other needs during the children’s dependency and her retraining. The excess over her original entitlement is to be shared rateably between Erkan and Fisun's shares.

Parties
Plaintiff: Esin Paul; Defendant: Erkan Satici
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Additional provision ordered
Legal Topics
Family Provision, Adult Child Claims, Proper Maintenance and Advancement, Testamentary Intentions
Succession Law Equity Family Provision Adult Child Claims Proper Maintenance and Advancement Testamentary Intentions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esin Paul

Plaintiff

Erkan Satici

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether adequate provision was made for Esin Paul under the Will of Yilmaz Satici
  2. 2 What constitutes adequate provision for the proper maintenance, education or advancement in life of an adult child under the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
  3. 3 Whether provision to purchase a home is proper in the applicant's circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

For this estate and the plaintiff's circumstances (adult child, no property, dependents, medical limitations), the quarter share was inadequate provision. However, the estate was not of a size or nature to justify provision to buy an unencumbered home. Proper provision is $700,000 in place of her quarter share, including a buffer for rent and other needs during the children’s dependency and her retraining. The excess over her original entitlement is to be shared rateably between Erkan and Fisun's shares.

Court Disposition

Additional provision ordered

Orders

  • Provision of $700,000 to Esin Paul in lieu of her quarter share of the estate
  • The excess of this amount over her quarter share is to be borne rateably by Erkan Satici (including his codicil legacy) and Fisun Katsamatsas