Foweraker v Krishnanantharmoorty & Anor [1999] NSWCA 294
The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge was entitled to reject the appellant's claim of significant ongoing physical and psychological injury arising from the accident, given her return to full employment, the videotape evidence contradicting her account of disability, objective evidence of non-accident...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Concerning Adequacy of Damages for Injuries From a Motor Vehicle Accident / Appeal by Way of Rehearing From the District Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['assessment of Damages' 'economic Loss' 'non Economic Loss' 'credibility Findings' 'appellate Review of Findings of Fact']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning Adequacy of Damages for Injuries From a Motor Vehicle Accident / Appeal by Way of Rehearing From the District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the District Court erred in rejecting the appellant's claim that the accident caused or materially contributed to significant ongoing physical and psychological disability." 'Whether the damages assessed for non-economic loss, past economic loss, out of pocket expenses and future out of pocket expenses were inadequate.' 'Whether the Court of Appeal should interfere with adverse credibility findings made by the trial judge.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge was entitled to reject the appellant's claim of significant ongoing physical and psychological injury arising from the accident, given her return to full employment, the videotape evidence contradicting her account of disability, objective evidence of non-accident factors affecting her condition, the absence of objective indicia of trauma, and the adverse credibility findings in a case where the appellant bore the onus of proof.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.' 'The costs include those incurred on the day when the parties were directed to appear before Mason P so that the appellant might explain her default in failing to file appeal papers and submissions in time.' "Counsel's costs for the hearing date that had been set aside were not...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment