Dunford v Gosford City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1016
Development is permissible under the relevant environmental planning instruments, satisfies requirements of DCP 125 and DCP 2013 for construction prior to revetment wall, height and FSR variations are justified as strict compliance is unreasonable, and view loss is not catastrophic; thus, appeal is upheld and development is approved subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'coastal Hazard' 'public Interest' 'height and Floor Space Ratio' 'view Loss']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development avoids or minimises potential risk from coastal erosion' 'Whether the proposed development is in the public interest given coastal hazard processes' 'Compliance with relevant planning controls, including height and floor space ratio' 'Impact on scenic views and view sharing']
Ratio Decidendi
Development is permissible under the relevant environmental planning instruments, satisfies requirements of DCP 125 and DCP 2013 for construction prior to revetment wall, height and FSR variations are justified as strict compliance is unreasonable, and view loss is not catastrophic; thus, appeal is upheld and development is approved subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'DA 45125/2014 for demolition and construction at 23B Ocean View Drive, Wamberal is approved subject to conditions in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits are returned with the exception of exhibits 6, 14, A and B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment