Ford v NSW Minister for Land & Water Conservation [2000] FCA 1913
The application was struck out because it did not comply with the old Act's application requirements. The identification of the other claimants merely as "The Elouera People" was inadequate, and the later affidavit material did not cure the defect, including because references such as "all future members of the body corporate" remained inadequate. The application also failed to identify the native title rights and interests claimed; the references to meeting, fishing and maintaining a spiritual connection did not amount to a claim of specific native title rights or interests over any particular part or the whole of the claimed area. No proposed amended application was before the Court,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Determination Application / Second Respondent's Notice of Motion Seeking Dismissal, Treated as an Application to Strike Out Under S 84 C of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
- Outcome
- The application was struck out under s 84C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), with no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['strike Out of Native Title Application' 'compliance With Application Requirements' 'identification of Native Title Claim Group' 'identification of Native Title Rights and Interests' 'leave to Amend']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Application / Second Respondent's Notice of Motion Seeking Dismissal, Treated as an Application to Strike Out Under S 84 C of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the native title determination application should be struck out under s 84C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) for non-compliance with s 61 of the old Act.' 'Whether identifying the other claimants as "The Elouera people" adequately described or identified the persons on whose behalf the claim was made.' 'Whether the application adequately identified the native title rights and interests claimed.' 'Whether the applicant should be given an opportunity to amend the application.']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was struck out because it did not comply with the old Act's application requirements. The identification of the other claimants merely as "The Elouera People" was inadequate, and the later affidavit material did not cure the defect, including because references such as "all future members of the body corporate" remained inadequate. The application also failed to identify the native title rights and interests claimed; the references to meeting, fishing and maintaining a spiritual connection did not amount to a claim of specific native title rights or interests over any particular part or the whole of the claimed area. No proposed amended application was before the Court,...
Court Disposition
The application was struck out under s 84C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), with no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The application be struck out under s 84C of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).' 'There will be no order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment