Rikkone v NSW Ombudsman and TAFE NSW [2023] NSWCATAD 278
The Tribunal dismissed the application on the basis that it does not have jurisdiction to review the decisions of TAFE NSW or the NSW Ombudsman as there is no enabling legislation conferring such jurisdiction, nor can it consider a discrimination complaint without prior referral from the President of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Esther Vladislavouna Rikkone; First Respondent: NSW Ombudsman; Second Respondent: TAFE NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review Application and Discrimination Complaint / Application for Review Determined on the Papers, Jurisdiction Assessed
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; misconceived and lacking in substance under s 55(1)(b) of the NCAT Act.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Administrative Review, Discrimination, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Referral Requirement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Vladislavouna Rikkone
Applicant
NSW Ombudsman
First Respondent
TAFE NSW
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review Application and Discrimination Complaint / Application for Review Determined on the Papers, Jurisdiction Assessed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has administrative review jurisdiction over decisions of TAFE NSW or NSW Ombudsman
- 2 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider discrimination complaints without referral under s 95 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal dismissed the application on the basis that it does not have jurisdiction to review the decisions of TAFE NSW or the NSW Ombudsman as there is no enabling legislation conferring such jurisdiction, nor can it consider a discrimination complaint without prior referral from the President of the Anti-Discrimination Board under s 95 of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; misconceived and lacking in substance under s 55(1)(b) of the NCAT Act.
Orders
- The application is dismissed on the basis that it is misconceived and lacking in substance under s 55(1)(b) of the NCAT ACT.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment