In the matter of Estia Health Limited (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1521
The scheme was approved because the evidence established compliance with the convening and supplementary disclosure orders, passage of the scheme resolution by the requisite statutory majorities, no reason arising from voter turnout to doubt the efficacy of the meeting procedure, satisfaction of relevant conditions precedent, ASIC's written statement of no objection for s 411(17)(b), and no later matter making the scheme inappropriate for approval.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Orders Approving a Scheme of Arrangement / Adjourned Second Court Hearing
- Outcome
- Orders made approving a scheme of arrangement.
- Legal Topics
- ['schemes of Arrangement' 'arrangements and Reconstructions' 'court Approval of Scheme of Arrangement' 'shareholder Approval' 'asic No Objection']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Orders Approving a Scheme of Arrangement / Adjourned Second Court Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the scheme meeting was convened and held in accordance with the Court's orders." 'Whether the scheme resolution was passed by the requisite statutory majorities under s 411(4)(a)(ii) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether conditions precedent to the scheme had been satisfied.' 'Whether the Court should exercise its residual discretion to approve the scheme under s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether Estia Health should be exempted under s 411(12) from compliance with s 411(11) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
The scheme was approved because the evidence established compliance with the convening and supplementary disclosure orders, passage of the scheme resolution by the requisite statutory majorities, no reason arising from voter turnout to doubt the efficacy of the meeting procedure, satisfaction of relevant conditions precedent, ASIC's written statement of no objection for s 411(17)(b), and no later matter making the scheme inappropriate for approval.
Court Disposition
Orders made approving a scheme of arrangement.
Orders
- ['The scheme was approved pursuant to s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'An order was made under s 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) exempting Estia Health from compliance with s 411(11) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment