ETD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1373

ETD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1373

None of the grounds advanced for leave to appeal or extension of time have sufficient merit. The applicant did not seek an interpreter before the Tribunal, had proficiency in English, and the Registrar and primary judge acted within their powers; no appealable error is demonstrated.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 September 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'procedural Fairness' 'judicial Review' 'interpreter Requirements' 'dismissal for Non Appearance']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'procedural Fairness' 'judicial Review' 'interpreter Requirements' 'dismissal for Non Appearance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the application for extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted' "Whether there was a breach of procedural fairness by the Tribunal's failure to arrange for an interpreter" 'Whether the Registrar had the authority to dismiss the application for non-appearance']

Ratio Decidendi

None of the grounds advanced for leave to appeal or extension of time have sufficient merit. The applicant did not seek an interpreter before the Tribunal, had proficiency in English, and the Registrar and primary judge acted within their powers; no appealable error is demonstrated.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or assessed."]