Islam & Anor v Ul Karim [2023] NSWSC 717
The plaintiffs' Summons did not disclose any reasonable cause of action. Mr Islam, as a director or shareholder, lacks standing to pursue claims for losses properly belonging to the company in liquidation, and cannot bring or maintain proceedings on the company's behalf without the liquidator's consent. The types of orders sought in the Summons (e.g., criminal conviction, reporting to immigration authorities) are outside the court's civil jurisdiction and do not disclose justiciable causes of action. The application for summary dismissal is clearly made out and must be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Notice of Motion—application to Dismiss Summons
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed; costs ordered against first plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Dismissal' 'strike Out' 'reasonable Cause of Action' 'company in Liquidation' 'standing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Notice of Motion—application to Dismiss Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiffs' Summons discloses a reasonable cause of action" 'Whether the proceedings should be dismissed pursuant to rule 13.4 of the UCPR' 'Whether Mr Islam has standing to pursue claims on behalf of the company in liquidation']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs' Summons did not disclose any reasonable cause of action. Mr Islam, as a director or shareholder, lacks standing to pursue claims for losses properly belonging to the company in liquidation, and cannot bring or maintain proceedings on the company's behalf without the liquidator's consent. The types of orders sought in the Summons (e.g., criminal conviction, reporting to immigration authorities) are outside the court's civil jurisdiction and do not disclose justiciable causes of action. The application for summary dismissal is clearly made out and must be granted.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed; costs ordered against first plaintiff.
Orders
- ['The Summons is dismissed pursuant to rule 13.4 of the UCPR.' "The first plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the Summons."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment