NXU [2023] NSWCATGD 24
The Tribunal consented to the proposed hysterectomy as special medical treatment because NXU is not capable of providing consent due to intellectual disability, no sufficiently effective alternative treatments are available, the proposed treatment is necessary to prevent serious damage to health and complies with relevant guidelines.
- Parties
- Person: NXU; Applicant: EUM; Carer: NZU
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Consent to Special Medical Treatment / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Consent given for special medical treatment (hysterectomy) for NXU for a period of twelve months.
- Legal Topics
- Consent to Medical Treatment, Special Medical Treatment, Capacity to Consent, Necessity of Treatment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NXU
Person
EUM
Applicant
NZU
Carer
Procedural Posture
Application for Consent to Special Medical Treatment / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the proposed hysterectomy special medical treatment under the Guardianship Act?
- 2 Is the patient capable of providing consent?
- 3 Are alternative treatments available and appropriate?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal consented to the proposed hysterectomy as special medical treatment because NXU is not capable of providing consent due to intellectual disability, no sufficiently effective alternative treatments are available, the proposed treatment is necessary to prevent serious damage to health and complies with relevant guidelines.
Court Disposition
Consent given for special medical treatment (hysterectomy) for NXU for a period of twelve months.
Orders
- Consent to hysterectomy (removal of uterus and cervix and bilateral fallopian tubes) under general anaesthetic, and any necessary treatment normally provided in association with or directly consequent upon that treatment.
- Consent effective for a period of twelve months from the order date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment