Eva Joy Ambrus v Lee Ellen Buchanan (No. 2) [2023] NSWSC 5
The defendants’ unreasonable conduct—including failing to advance any substantial argument, bringing unmeritorious amendment applications, and abandoning pleaded grounds late—caused unnecessary costs, justifying a departure from the usual order that all co-owners’ costs be paid from the proceeds of sale. Instead, the plaintiff’s costs and some limited defendants’ costs are to be paid from the proceeds of sale, with defendants otherwise to bear their own costs.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Eva Joy Ambrus; First Defendant: Lee Ellen Buchanan; Second Defendant: Rudolf Ernst Thaesler; Third Defendant: Erin Frances Donkin; Fourth Defendant: Sharon Elizabeth Boyd; Fifth Defendant: Willow Hallgren; Sixth Defendant: Courtney Donkin; Seventh Defendant: Michael Wayne Donkin; Eighth Defendant: Earthwands Pty Limited; Ninth Defendant: Caitlin Donkin; Tenth Defendant: Barbara Straker; Eleventh Defendant: Ian James McQueen; Twelfth Defendant: Michael David McQueen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Real Property / Costs Determination Following Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders as to costs made: plaintiff’s costs (and certain defendants’ costs) to be paid from proceeds of sale; defendants otherwise to bear their own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Trusts for Sale, Co Ownership
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eva Joy Ambrus
Plaintiff
Lee Ellen Buchanan
First Defendant
Rudolf Ernst Thaesler
Second Defendant
Erin Frances Donkin
Third Defendant
Sharon Elizabeth Boyd
Fourth Defendant
Willow Hallgren
Fifth Defendant
Courtney Donkin
Sixth Defendant
Michael Wayne Donkin
Seventh Defendant
Earthwands Pty Limited
Eighth Defendant
Caitlin Donkin
Ninth Defendant
Barbara Straker
Tenth Defendant
Ian James McQueen
Eleventh Defendant
Michael David McQueen
Twelfth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Real Property / Costs Determination Following Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the usual order as to costs under s 66G Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) should be departed from due to unreasonable conduct by the defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants’ unreasonable conduct—including failing to advance any substantial argument, bringing unmeritorious amendment applications, and abandoning pleaded grounds late—caused unnecessary costs, justifying a departure from the usual order that all co-owners’ costs be paid from the proceeds of sale. Instead, the plaintiff’s costs and some limited defendants’ costs are to be paid from the proceeds of sale, with defendants otherwise to bear their own costs.
Court Disposition
Orders as to costs made: plaintiff’s costs (and certain defendants’ costs) to be paid from proceeds of sale; defendants otherwise to bear their own costs.
Orders
- Plaintiff's costs of the proceedings (including costs incurred in relation to the defendants' Grounds of Defence) be paid from the proceeds of sale of the land at 193 Hidden Valley Road in Mount Warning, New South Wales, being the land in folio identifier 38/755754 (including sub-folios 38/755754B, C and D).
- Defendants' costs of preparing the affidavits of John Maxwell dated 23 August 2021, David Keep dated 2 September 2021 and Geoffrey Radburn dated 23 March 2022 be paid from the proceeds of sale of the Land.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment