Tritton Resources Pty Limited v Ever Rock Navigation S.A. [2017] FCA 1605
On the material before the Court, including expert evidence and the Panama Maritime Authority report, the plaintiffs established a prima facie case for relief against Ever Rock sufficient to satisfy r 10.43(4)(c). The proceeding appeared to fall within service-out categories in r 10.42, including a cause of action arising in Australia, a contract made in or governed by Australian law or breach of that contract, and potentially a contravention of an Act committed in Australia. Evidence was accepted that service could be effected in Panama by legalised or apostilled court documents at the address of Ever Rock's resident agent, subject to the further affidavit establishing the Panamanian...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty and Maritime Proceeding Concerning Carriage of Goods by Sea / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Serve Originating Application and Statement of Claim on the Defendant in Panama
- Outcome
- Leave granted to serve legalised copies of the Court Documents, with Spanish translations, on the defendant in the Republic of Panama; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['service Outside Australia' 'prima Facie Case for Relief' 'hague Visby Rules' 'seaworthiness' 'passage Planning' 'without Prejudice Privilege']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Admiralty and Maritime Proceeding Concerning Carriage of Goods by Sea / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Serve Originating Application and Statement of Claim on the Defendant in Panama
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs should have leave under rules 10.42 and 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 to serve the originating application and statement of claim on Ever Rock Navigation S.A. in Panama.' 'Whether the plaintiffs established a prima facie case for relief against Ever Rock Navigation S.A. for the purposes of r 10.43(4)(c).' 'Whether the proposed method of service in Panama was permitted by the law of Panama.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the material before the Court, including expert evidence and the Panama Maritime Authority report, the plaintiffs established a prima facie case for relief against Ever Rock sufficient to satisfy r 10.43(4)(c). The proceeding appeared to fall within service-out categories in r 10.42, including a cause of action arising in Australia, a contract made in or governed by Australian law or breach of that contract, and potentially a contravention of an Act committed in Australia. Evidence was accepted that service could be effected in Panama by legalised or apostilled court documents at the address of Ever Rock's resident agent, subject to the further affidavit establishing the Panamanian...
Court Disposition
Leave granted to serve legalised copies of the Court Documents, with Spanish translations, on the defendant in the Republic of Panama; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['The Plaintiffs have leave, pursuant to rules 10.42 and 10.43 of the Federal Court Rules 2011, to serve legalised (by apostille) copies of the Originating Application, the Statement of Claim, the Plaintiffs\' Genuine Steps Statement and this Order (together, "Court Documents"), together with copies of the Court...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment