Everbow Pty Ltd & Anor v Goodwin [2006] NSWSC 360
Because the plaintiffs had executed notices of withdrawal of caveat to be used upon settlement of the mortgagee sale, any extension would be followed by extinguishment when the withdrawal was used. The asserted effect on priority was not established on the material before the court, so there was little utility in extending the caveat and the discretion to extend it should be refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Extend the Operation of a Caveat Under S 74 K of the Real Property Act 1900 / Ex Tempore Judgment on Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['torrens Title' 'caveats Against Dealings' 'withdrawal of Caveat' 'mortgagee Sale' 'extension of Caveat']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Extend the Operation of a Caveat Under S 74 K of the Real Property Act 1900 / Ex Tempore Judgment on Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the operation of the plaintiffs' caveat should be extended under s 74K of the Real Property Act 1900 when notices of withdrawal of caveat had been executed and handed over to be used upon settlement of a mortgagee sale." 'Whether there was any utility in extending a caveat that was intended to be extinguished upon settlement.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the plaintiffs had executed notices of withdrawal of caveat to be used upon settlement of the mortgagee sale, any extension would be followed by extinguishment when the withdrawal was used. The asserted effect on priority was not established on the material before the court, so there was little utility in extending the caveat and the discretion to extend it should be refused.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The notice of motion is dismissed.' "The plaintiffs are to pay the defendant's costs." 'The matter is stood over before the Registrar at 9.30 am on Friday 28 April 2006.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment