Bauer Consumer Media Limited v Evergreen Television Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 507
Evergreen Television Pty Ltd was found to be the first user and owner of the trade mark 'Discover Downunder' in relation to the production of television programs. Bauer failed to establish first use prior to Evergreen's licence agreement with Channel Ten. Evergreen demonstrated intention to use in good faith; application was not made in bad faith. Use of the mark was not likely to deceive or confuse and was not contrary to law. Non-use proceedings failed because Evergreen's inability to use the mark during the relevant periods was due to insurmountable obstacles presented by Bauer's conduct, and discretion was exercised not to remove the mark from the Register.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Removal Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; removal application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['trade Marks' 'trade Mark Ownership' 'trade Mark Registration' 'non Use Proceedings' 'opposition to Registration']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Removal Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Evergreen Television Pty Ltd was the first user and owner of the trade mark 'Discover Downunder' for television program production services as at the filing date" 'Whether Evergreen intended to use the mark in good faith when applying for registration' 'Whether the registration application was made in bad faith' 'Whether use of the mark would likely deceive or cause confusion because of prior reputation' 'Whether use of the mark would be contrary to law, specifically the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)' 'Whether grounds for removal for non-use were established']
Ratio Decidendi
Evergreen Television Pty Ltd was found to be the first user and owner of the trade mark 'Discover Downunder' in relation to the production of television programs. Bauer failed to establish first use prior to Evergreen's licence agreement with Channel Ten. Evergreen demonstrated intention to use in good faith; application was not made in bad faith. Use of the mark was not likely to deceive or confuse and was not contrary to law. Non-use proceedings failed because Evergreen's inability to use the mark during the relevant periods was due to insurmountable obstacles presented by Bauer's conduct, and discretion was exercised not to remove the mark from the Register.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; removal application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal from the decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks is dismissed.' "The first and second appellants/applicants are to pay the respondent's costs as agreed or assessed." 'The application for an order for removal of the trade mark is dismissed.' "The first and second applicants are to pay the respondent's...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment