Alexei Poezd & Ors v Evgueni Poezd [2005] NSWSC 899
The plaintiffs' evidence, corroborated by transfers of money, migration arrangements, sponsorship material, and the parties' e-mail correspondence, established a common intention that the plaintiffs' money would be used to purchase property in Sydney for joint family ownership and occupation, and that the plaintiffs acted to their detriment by transferring funds and arranging their affairs in reliance on that intention. The defendant's alleged 1992 agreement to receive 50% of company income was rejected as unproved, implausible, and unsupported by records or accounting evidence. Accordingly, it would be unconscionable for the defendant to deny the plaintiffs' beneficial interests, and he...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Division Proceedings Seeking Declarations and Consequential Relief Concerning Alleged Constructive Trusts Over Real Property and Sale Proceeds / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs succeeded; the defendant was found to hold No. 29 Eurimbla Avenue, Randwick on trust for the plaintiffs and defendant as tenants in common in equal shares, and the plaintiffs were entitled to 75% of the proceeds of sale of the Chippendale unit.
- Legal Topics
- ['constructive Trusts' 'common Intention' 'beneficial Ownership' 'tenants in Common' 'family Property Purchase' 'detrimental Reliance' 'proceeds of Sale']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Proceedings Seeking Declarations and Consequential Relief Concerning Alleged Constructive Trusts Over Real Property and Sale Proceeds / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant held No. 29 Eurimbla Avenue, Randwick on constructive trust for the plaintiffs and defendant as tenants in common in equal shares.' 'Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to 75% of the proceeds of sale of unit No. 29/37 Dangar Place, Chippendale.' 'Whether money transferred by the plaintiffs from Russia to the defendant was provided for the purchase of family property to be owned jointly, or was paid to the defendant absolutely under an alleged agreement for 50% of after-tax income from the family company.' 'Whether the parties had a common intention that all would have beneficial interests in the property and whether the plaintiffs acted to their detriment on that intention.']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs' evidence, corroborated by transfers of money, migration arrangements, sponsorship material, and the parties' e-mail correspondence, established a common intention that the plaintiffs' money would be used to purchase property in Sydney for joint family ownership and occupation, and that the plaintiffs acted to their detriment by transferring funds and arranging their affairs in reliance on that intention. The defendant's alleged 1992 agreement to receive 50% of company income was rejected as unproved, implausible, and unsupported by records or accounting evidence. Accordingly, it would be unconscionable for the defendant to deny the plaintiffs' beneficial interests, and he...
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs succeeded; the defendant was found to hold No. 29 Eurimbla Avenue, Randwick on trust for the plaintiffs and defendant as tenants in common in equal shares, and the plaintiffs were entitled to 75% of the proceeds of sale of the Chippendale unit.
Orders
- ['Declaration to the effect that the defendant holds No. 29 Eurimbla Avenue, Randwick upon trust for the plaintiffs and the defendant as tenants in common in equal shares.' 'Order to the effect that 75% of the proceeds of sale of unit No. 29/37 Dangar Place, Chippendale be paid equally to the plaintiffs forthwith.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment