R v Hickson; R v McDonald [2022] NSWSC 1433
Leave to adduce Beau Coulthard's evidence was refused because Ms Salter did not herself give evidence of telling Mr Coulthard the material representation, and her evidence was complete; bolstering her evidence via hearsay would be unfair as Mr Rosser had made a forensic decision not to challenge her on that point; the issue must be resolved by reference to Ms Salter's evidence in court rather than via an untested hearsay representation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Evidentiary Application
- Outcome
- Leave to adduce further evidence of Beau Coulthard refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['evidence' 'credibility' 'admission of Hearsay' 'prior Consistent Statements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Evidentiary Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to adduce further evidence to restore the credibility of a witness under s 108 of the Evidence Act 1995; Whether the probative value of the proposed evidence is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice under s 137; Consideration of s 192(2) factors in deciding on leave']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to adduce Beau Coulthard's evidence was refused because Ms Salter did not herself give evidence of telling Mr Coulthard the material representation, and her evidence was complete; bolstering her evidence via hearsay would be unfair as Mr Rosser had made a forensic decision not to challenge her on that point; the issue must be resolved by reference to Ms Salter's evidence in court rather than via an untested hearsay representation.
Court Disposition
Leave to adduce further evidence of Beau Coulthard refused.
Orders
- ['Leave to adduce further evidence of Beau Coulthard refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment