R v Hunter (No 7) [2014] NSWSC 1150
Simply informing the accused of arrest, offence, and right to silence does not constitute an 'investigative procedure' for the purposes of the relevant statutes and regulations. Therefore, police complied with all statutory and regulatory requirements at the material times, and the contested evidence is admissible.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Accused: Paul Andrew Hunter
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Evidence not excluded
- Legal Topics
- Evidence, Admissibility, Improperly Obtained Evidence, Vulnerable Person, Compliance With Police Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Paul Andrew Hunter
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence obtained from conversations between accused and police on 21 June 2011 and 20 October 2011 should be excluded under s 138 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) due to alleged non-compliance with Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 and Regulation 2005
- 2 Whether requirements for caution, summary of rights, presence of support person, and legal representation for Aboriginal persons were complied with
Ratio Decidendi
Simply informing the accused of arrest, offence, and right to silence does not constitute an 'investigative procedure' for the purposes of the relevant statutes and regulations. Therefore, police complied with all statutory and regulatory requirements at the material times, and the contested evidence is admissible.
Court Disposition
Evidence not excluded
Orders
- I do not exclude the evidence of the exchange of 21 June 2011 or the evidence of the exchange of 20 October 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment