R v Powell, Steven [2010] NSWDC 84
The ERISP was excluded because the accused was unlawfully arrested for the purpose of questioning, police did not comply with required safeguards for vulnerable persons under LEPRA, and the caution given was inadequate to ensure the accused understood his rights. The desirability of admitting the evidence was outweighed by its undesirability due to improper and unlawful police conduct.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['exclusion of Evidence' 'unlawful Arrest' 'vulnerable Persons' 'aboriginal Persons' 'right to Silence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether evidence of the record of interview (ERISP) should be excluded' 'Whether the accused was lawfully arrested' 'Whether police complied with safeguards for vulnerable persons under LEPRA' 'Adequacy of caution given to the accused']
Ratio Decidendi
The ERISP was excluded because the accused was unlawfully arrested for the purpose of questioning, police did not comply with required safeguards for vulnerable persons under LEPRA, and the caution given was inadequate to ensure the accused understood his rights. The desirability of admitting the evidence was outweighed by its undesirability due to improper and unlawful police conduct.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- ['The ERISP is not to be admitted in evidence against the accused.' 'Copy of the judgment to be forwarded to the Attorney General for consideration of redrafting LEPRA Part 9 Caution/Summary document.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment