Central Tablelands County Council v Clow [2002] NSWCC 24
Because the worker's application for an increase in the continuing weekly award was an existing claim, the employer's application to terminate or reduce that same award arose under the Workers Compensation Acts in respect of an existing claim and was an existing claim matter within the Compensation Court's jurisdiction; the employer's application should therefore be restored and heard with the worker's current application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation / Notice of Motion to Restore Matters Deemed Struck Out Pursuant to Pt 10 R 4
- Outcome
- Notice of motion granted in part; Matter No 9111/89/1 restored to the list and ordered to be heard with Matter No 9111/89/3.
- Legal Topics
- ['existing Claim Matters' 'jurisdiction of Compensation Court' 'restoration of Struck Out Proceedings' 'review of Continuing Award']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation / Notice of Motion to Restore Matters Deemed Struck Out Pursuant to Pt 10 R 4
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the employer's application to diminish or terminate a continuing workers compensation award was an existing claim matter within the jurisdiction of the Compensation Court." 'Whether matters deemed struck out pursuant to Pt 10 r 4 should be restored to the list.' "Whether the employer's application and the worker's application for an increase in the continuing award should be heard together."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the worker's application for an increase in the continuing weekly award was an existing claim, the employer's application to terminate or reduce that same award arose under the Workers Compensation Acts in respect of an existing claim and was an existing claim matter within the Compensation Court's jurisdiction; the employer's application should therefore be restored and heard with the worker's current application.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion granted in part; Matter No 9111/89/1 restored to the list and ordered to be heard with Matter No 9111/89/3.
Orders
- ['Matter No 9111/89/1 restored to the list.' "By consent, employer to pay the applicant's costs of the motion." 'Certified for counsel on the motion.' 'Matter No 9111/89/1 and Matter No 9111/89/3 sent to the bottom of the pending list at Orange.' 'Matter No 9111/89/1 and Matter No 9111/89/3 to be heard together.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment