Expectation Pty Ltd v PRD Realty Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1207
Documents sought by the applicant are not relevant to any matter in question in the proceedings as pleaded; allegations in paragraph 6 do not support a cause of action, and the commission and financial documents sought do not relate to the issues of formation, content, or breach of contract or fiduciary duty. The inclusion of irrelevant matters in the pleadings does not expand the ambit of discovery, and discovery for the purpose of credit is not permitted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion (discovery Application) / Interlocutory Application Determined; Judgment on Discovery Dispute
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'relevance of Documents' 'fiduciary Duty' 'agency' 'contracts' 'trade Practices']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion (discovery Application) / Interlocutory Application Determined; Judgment on Discovery Dispute
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether documents sought by applicant are discoverable as relating to a matter in question in the proceeding under Order 15 rules 5 or 8 of the Federal Court Rules' 'Whether documents not going to pleaded issues may be discoverable by reason of being relevant to credit' 'Whether discovery can be ordered in respect of matters pleaded but not giving rise to a cause of action']
Ratio Decidendi
Documents sought by the applicant are not relevant to any matter in question in the proceedings as pleaded; allegations in paragraph 6 do not support a cause of action, and the commission and financial documents sought do not relate to the issues of formation, content, or breach of contract or fiduciary duty. The inclusion of irrelevant matters in the pleadings does not expand the ambit of discovery, and discovery for the purpose of credit is not permitted.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The notice of motion filed 15 July 1999 is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the first and second respondents' costs of and incidental to the notice of motion, to be taxed if not agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment