R v Warwick (No.56) [2018] NSWSC 2015
Dr Brouwer is adequately qualified by training, study, and experience to give the opinions expressed in her certificate; the evidence is admissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling
- Outcome
- evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'qualification of Expert Witnesses' 'wound Healing Rates' 'admissibility of Opinion Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is Dr Brouwer sufficiently qualified as an expert to give opinion evidence on wound healing rates?' 'Is her report on wound healing and blood loss admissible under the Evidence Act 1995?']
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Brouwer is adequately qualified by training, study, and experience to give the opinions expressed in her certificate; the evidence is admissible.
Court Disposition
evidence admitted
Orders
- ['Admit the evidence of Dr Brouwer']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment