Expile v Jabb's Excavations [2003] NSWSC 786
Both Notices to Produce should be set aside: because the dispute is moving to a new phase where the challenge to the creditors' meeting will be pleaded specifically, and because reissuing a Notice to Produce in identical terms after documents have been produced is oppressive.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Expile Pty Ltd; Defendant: Jabb's Excavations Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Wind Up Company / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Notice to Produce
- Outcome
- Notice to Produce set aside
- Legal Topics
- Notice to Produce, Company Administration, Deed of Company Arrangement, Challenge to Creditors' Resolution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Expile Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Jabb's Excavations Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Wind Up Company / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Notice to Produce
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether second Notice to Produce should be set aside given proceedings concerning challenge to creditors' resolution and deed of company arrangement; whether the Notice to Produce process was being misused or oppressive in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Both Notices to Produce should be set aside: because the dispute is moving to a new phase where the challenge to the creditors' meeting will be pleaded specifically, and because reissuing a Notice to Produce in identical terms after documents have been produced is oppressive.
Court Disposition
Notice to Produce set aside
Orders
- Notice of Motion to set aside Notices to Produce granted in terms of paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Notice of Motion
- Costs reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment