Expile v Jabb's Excavations [2003] NSWSC 786

Expile v Jabb's Excavations [2003] NSWSC 786

Both Notices to Produce should be set aside: because the dispute is moving to a new phase where the challenge to the creditors' meeting will be pleaded specifically, and because reissuing a Notice to Produce in identical terms after documents have been produced is oppressive.

Parties
Plaintiff: Expile Pty Ltd; Defendant: Jabb's Excavations Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 August 2003
Procedural Posture
Application to Wind Up Company / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Notice to Produce
Outcome
Notice to Produce set aside
Legal Topics
Notice to Produce, Company Administration, Deed of Company Arrangement, Challenge to Creditors' Resolution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Expile Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Jabb's Excavations Pty Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application to Wind Up Company / Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Notice to Produce

  1. 1 Whether second Notice to Produce should be set aside given proceedings concerning challenge to creditors' resolution and deed of company arrangement; whether the Notice to Produce process was being misused or oppressive in the circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

Both Notices to Produce should be set aside: because the dispute is moving to a new phase where the challenge to the creditors' meeting will be pleaded specifically, and because reissuing a Notice to Produce in identical terms after documents have been produced is oppressive.

Court Disposition

Notice to Produce set aside

Orders

  • Notice of Motion to set aside Notices to Produce granted in terms of paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Notice of Motion
  • Costs reserved