Michell Carbonised Wool Exports Pty Ltd v Export Development Grants Board [1984] FCA 74
Section 16(1) of the Export Expansion Grants Act 1978 cannot be applied in respect of the first grant year because there is no earlier year against which a 'corresponding increase' in export earnings can be measured. The Board should not have applied s.16(1) for the year commencing 1 July 1977, and the Tribunal erred in affirming that decision.
- Parties
- Applicants: MICHELL CARBONISED WOOL EXPORTS PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL WOOL EXPORTS (CANADA) PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL LEATHER EXPORTS PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL WOOL TOP EXPORTS PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL SHEEPSKINS PTY. LIMITED; MICHELLEX (WOOL) PTY. LIMITED; G.H. MICHELL & SONS (S.A.) PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL SCOURED WOOL EXPORTS PTY. LIMITED; Respondent: EXPORT DEVELOPMENT GRANTS BOARD
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Export Expansion Grants, Statutory Interpretation, Exercise of Statutory Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MICHELL CARBONISED WOOL EXPORTS PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL WOOL EXPORTS (CANADA) PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL LEATHER EXPORTS PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL WOOL TOP EXPORTS PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL SHEEPSKINS PTY. LIMITED; MICHELLEX (WOOL) PTY. LIMITED; G.H. MICHELL & SONS (S.A.) PTY. LIMITED; MICHELL SCOURED WOOL EXPORTS PTY. LIMITED
Applicants
EXPORT DEVELOPMENT GRANTS BOARD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Meaning and operation of s.16 of Export Expansion Grants Act 1978
- 2 Whether s.16(1) is subject to an implied limitation regarding purpose
- 3 Interpretation of 'act or thing done' in s.16(1)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 16(1) of the Export Expansion Grants Act 1978 cannot be applied in respect of the first grant year because there is no earlier year against which a 'corresponding increase' in export earnings can be measured. The Board should not have applied s.16(1) for the year commencing 1 July 1977, and the Tribunal erred in affirming that decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Each appeal is allowed.
- The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal dated 9 September 1983 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment