Cathro, in the matter of Custom Bus Australia Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) [2018] FCA 113
Having regard to the principles governing extension applications, the evidence of complexity and need for further time to complete sale and investigations, lack of creditor objection, and reasonable expectations for progression, an extension of the convening period is warranted under s 439A(6).
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Simon John Cathro and Aaron Kevin Lucan in their capacities as joint and several administrators of Custom Bus Australia Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) ACN 600 985 895; Second Plaintiff: Custom Bus Australia Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) ACN 600 985 895; Third Plaintiff: Simon John Cathro and Aaron Kevin Lucan in their capacities as joint and several administrators of Custom Bus Holdings Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) ACN 600 982 947; Fourth Plaintiff: Custom Bus Holdings Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) ACN 600 982 947
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Convening Period
- Outcome
- Extension of the convening period granted; ancillary communications and procedural orders also made.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Convening Period, Administrators’ Duties, Creditors' Meetings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon John Cathro and Aaron Kevin Lucan in their capacities as joint and several administrators of Custom Bus Australia Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) ACN 600 985 895
First Plaintiff
Custom Bus Australia Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) ACN 600 985 895
Second Plaintiff
Simon John Cathro and Aaron Kevin Lucan in their capacities as joint and several administrators of Custom Bus Holdings Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) ACN 600 982 947
Third Plaintiff
Custom Bus Holdings Pty Ltd (administrators appointed) ACN 600 982 947
Fourth Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Convening Period
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to extend the convening period for the second creditors’ meeting under s 439A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether ancillary orders regarding notice and meetings should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
Having regard to the principles governing extension applications, the evidence of complexity and need for further time to complete sale and investigations, lack of creditor objection, and reasonable expectations for progression, an extension of the convening period is warranted under s 439A(6).
Court Disposition
Extension of the convening period granted; ancillary communications and procedural orders also made.
Orders
- The period to convene the meeting of creditors for Custom Bus Australia Pty Ltd and Custom Bus Holdings Pty Ltd extended to 16 May 2018 under s 439A(6) Corporations Act.
- The meetings may be held at any time during, or within five business days after, the extended convening period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment