Gazcorp Pty Ltd v Westfield Management Pty Ltd & Anor (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 130

Gazcorp Pty Ltd v Westfield Management Pty Ltd & Anor (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 130

There was a real though uncertain prospect of Gazcorp obtaining appropriate development consent within a reasonable time, and unwarranted hardship would result from enforcing the order prior to clarity; extension of the stay was proper to allow time for this without excessive delay.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 April 2004
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Stay / Post Appeal, Consequential Application
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
['extension of Stay' 'unauthorised Use of Property' 'development Consent']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Stay / Post Appeal, Consequential Application

  1. 1 ['Whether the stay of operation of the order restraining use of property as a warehouse clearance outlet should be extended due to changed circumstances']

Ratio Decidendi

There was a real though uncertain prospect of Gazcorp obtaining appropriate development consent within a reasonable time, and unwarranted hardship would result from enforcing the order prior to clarity; extension of the stay was proper to allow time for this without excessive delay.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • ['Extension of the stay of operation of order (2) in order 3 made on 31 March 2004 until 30 June 2004.' "Westfield to pay Gazcorp's costs of the notice of motion."]