Gazcorp Pty Ltd v Westfield Management Pty Ltd & Anor (No 2) [2004] NSWCA 130
There was a real though uncertain prospect of Gazcorp obtaining appropriate development consent within a reasonable time, and unwarranted hardship would result from enforcing the order prior to clarity; extension of the stay was proper to allow time for this without excessive delay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Stay / Post Appeal, Consequential Application
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Stay' 'unauthorised Use of Property' 'development Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Stay / Post Appeal, Consequential Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the stay of operation of the order restraining use of property as a warehouse clearance outlet should be extended due to changed circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
There was a real though uncertain prospect of Gazcorp obtaining appropriate development consent within a reasonable time, and unwarranted hardship would result from enforcing the order prior to clarity; extension of the stay was proper to allow time for this without excessive delay.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['Extension of the stay of operation of order (2) in order 3 made on 31 March 2004 until 30 June 2004.' "Westfield to pay Gazcorp's costs of the notice of motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment