Gurung v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1728

The application for extension of time was dismissed because the applicants did not appear at the hearing, and non-appearance had been consistent in prior proceedings.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 09 November 2018
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Time / Dismissal Hearing
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: ['extension of Time' 'non Appearance' 'costs']

['administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights'] ['extension of Time' 'non Appearance' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time / Dismissal Hearing

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the application for extension of time should be dismissed for non-appearance']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time was dismissed because the applicants did not appear at the hearing, and non-appearance had been consistent in prior proceedings.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

['The application for an extension of time is dismissed pursuant to r 35.33(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).' "The applicants must pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the application."]