re Moss, L. ex parte Tyaraf Pty. Limited [1985] FCA 403
Section 33(1)(c) does not empower the Court to extend the six-month period specified in s. 44(1)(c) for presentation of a creditor's petition. The act of bankruptcy relied upon was committed outside the statutory period and the petition cannot be presented.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings / Application for Extension of Time and Presentation of Creditor's Petition
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'act of Bankruptcy' 'presentation of Petition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings / Application for Extension of Time and Presentation of Creditor's Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court has power under s. 33(1)(c) Bankruptcy Act 1966 to extend the time referred to in s. 44(1)(c) for presenting a sequestration petition where the act of bankruptcy occurred more than 6 months before presentation']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 33(1)(c) does not empower the Court to extend the six-month period specified in s. 44(1)(c) for presentation of a creditor's petition. The act of bankruptcy relied upon was committed outside the statutory period and the petition cannot be presented.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- ['Petition dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment