Cochrane v Peteranel & Morton [1999] NSWCA 3

Cochrane v Peteranel & Morton [1999] NSWCA 3

The delay in seeking an extension was largely the result of confusion arising from incomplete judgment transcripts and the illness of the appellant's solicitor. The explanation was sufficient in the circumstances; there was no evidence of special prejudice to the respondents, nor were the appeals hopeless or not bona fide. Granting an extension of time would serve the interests of justice.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 January 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Extension of Time to Appeal; Interlocutory Order
Outcome
extension of time to file and serve notices of appeal granted; costs ordered against claimant's legal representatives
Legal Topics
['extension of Time to Appeal' 'appeals Process' 'costs Orders']
['civil Procedure'] ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'appeals Process' 'costs Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Extension of Time to Appeal; Interlocutory Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve notices of appeal' 'Whether the delay in seeking an extension was adequately explained' 'Whether the respondent would suffer prejudice if extension of time is granted']

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in seeking an extension was largely the result of confusion arising from incomplete judgment transcripts and the illness of the appellant's solicitor. The explanation was sufficient in the circumstances; there was no evidence of special prejudice to the respondents, nor were the appeals hopeless or not bona fide. Granting an extension of time would serve the interests of justice.

Court Disposition

extension of time to file and serve notices of appeal granted; costs ordered against claimant's legal representatives

Orders

  • ['Time to file and serve notices of appeal extended to 28 August 1998' 'Claimant to pay opponents’ costs of the motion, those costs to be borne by claimant’s legal representatives' 'Respondent granted indemnity costs for adjourned hearing on 3 August 1998']