CCX15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1418
The applicants failed to appear at the listed hearing despite notices having been sent to the address in their application, and they had not actively pursued the application by filing a draft notice of appeal or written submissions as ordered; in those circumstances the application was dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia / Hearing of Application; Application Dismissed for Failure of the Applicants to Appear
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; applicants to pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'protection Visas' 'failure to Appear at Hearing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia / Hearing of Application; Application Dismissed for Failure of the Applicants to Appear
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application for an extension of time to appeal should be dismissed because the applicants failed to appear at the hearing']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants failed to appear at the listed hearing despite notices having been sent to the address in their application, and they had not actively pursued the application by filing a draft notice of appeal or written submissions as ordered; in those circumstances the application was dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; applicants to pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) for failure of the applicants to appear at the hearing.' "The applicants' pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment