EXV17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1780
The appellant's new grounds of appeal have insufficient merit as the Immigration Assessment Authority did not err in refusing to consider information and claims not raised before the delegate, and there was no jurisdictional error; furthermore, the IAA did consider all claims clearly raised on the material before it.
- Parties
- Appellant: EXV17; First Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From Federal Circuit Court to Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error, Procedural Fairness, Treatment of New Information in Migration 'fast Track' Reviews
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EXV17
Appellant
Minister for Home Affairs
First Respondent
Immigration Assessment Authority
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Migration Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From Federal Circuit Court to Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to properly consider all claims made by the appellant
- 2 Whether the appellant was denied an opportunity to comment on a claim
- 3 Whether jurisdictional error occurred by the treatment of 'new information'
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's new grounds of appeal have insufficient merit as the Immigration Assessment Authority did not err in refusing to consider information and claims not raised before the delegate, and there was no jurisdictional error; furthermore, the IAA did consider all claims clearly raised on the material before it.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to amend the Notice of Appeal is refused.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment