F & D Bonaccorso Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council [2007] NSWLEC 222
A modified stay was warranted because amendment of the register before appeal could expose the council to potentially large financial consequences, the appeal might test an unexercised power of the Court to amend the register under the Real Property Act, the Registrar-General would place a caveat on title and append the orders, and undertakings would prevent dealings with the land and seek expedition of the appeal; these considerations outweighed the applicant's concerns.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Order to Rectify Register Under the Real Property Act 1900 / After Final Orders; Pending Exhaustion of Appeal Rights to the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Stay granted in modified form.
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Orders Pending Appeal' 'rectification of Register' "registrar General's Caveat" 'undertakings to the Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Order to Rectify Register Under the Real Property Act 1900 / After Final Orders; Pending Exhaustion of Appeal Rights to the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the order requiring the Registrar-General to amend the register under the Real Property Act 1900 should be stayed until the parties' appeal rights to the Court of Appeal have been exhausted."]
Ratio Decidendi
A modified stay was warranted because amendment of the register before appeal could expose the council to potentially large financial consequences, the appeal might test an unexercised power of the Court to amend the register under the Real Property Act, the Registrar-General would place a caveat on title and append the orders, and undertakings would prevent dealings with the land and seek expedition of the appeal; these considerations outweighed the applicant's concerns.
Court Disposition
Stay granted in modified form.
Orders
- ["Upon the first respondent undertaking to the Court to seek expedition of the hearing of its appeal to the Court of Appeal, the third respondent undertaking to the Court not to dispose of or deal with, or attempt to dispose of or deal with the lots comprising Chapman Reserve pending further order, and the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment