Fabemu (No 2) Pty Ltd v Kiama Municipal Council [2023] NSWLEC 79
The borehole drilling was engineering work relating to the approved development and occurred before the extended lapsing date, but condition 4 of the development consent required a traffic control management plan, designed by an RMS accredited designer and approved by Council, before commencement of any works. Because condition 4 was of general application and had not been satisfied before the borehole drilling, those works were carried out in breach of the condition and could not be relied upon to physically commence the consent under s 4.53(4).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceedings Seeking a Declaration Concerning Physical Commencement of a Development Consent Under S 4.53(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Principal Judgment on Amended Summons
- Outcome
- Amended Summons dismissed and declaration refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['lapsing of Development Consent' 'physical Commencement' 'engineering Works' 'conditions Precedent' 'traffic Control Management Plan']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings Seeking a Declaration Concerning Physical Commencement of a Development Consent Under S 4.53(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Principal Judgment on Amended Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether geotechnical borehole drilling constituted building, engineering or construction work relating to the approved development for the purposes of s 4.53(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether the borehole drilling was physically commenced on the land before the consent would otherwise lapse.' 'Whether unsatisfied conditions of consent, particularly condition 4 requiring a traffic control management plan before commencement of any works, prevented reliance on the borehole drilling as physical commencement of the consent.']
Ratio Decidendi
The borehole drilling was engineering work relating to the approved development and occurred before the extended lapsing date, but condition 4 of the development consent required a traffic control management plan, designed by an RMS accredited designer and approved by Council, before commencement of any works. Because condition 4 was of general application and had not been satisfied before the borehole drilling, those works were carried out in breach of the condition and could not be relied upon to physically commence the consent under s 4.53(4).
Court Disposition
Amended Summons dismissed and declaration refused.
Orders
- ['The Amended Summons is dismissed.' 'The application for a declaration that Development Consent 10.2015.77.1 dated 25 October 2016 for the construction of a dwelling at 242 Fern Street, Gerringong has commenced is refused.' 'The exhibits are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment